Reliability and outages
Agency owners can like HighLevel's founders, team, value, and community while still being hurt by operational failures. The agency may be patient because it understands the platform. Its client only sees missed calls, late follow-up, unavailable calendars, or leads that did not move. This page documents that tension without treating every bug as a full-platform outage or assuming that positive reviewers are being dishonest.
Researched by HighLevel vs Votel Editorial Team · Last verified September 12, 2026 · Methodology · We may earn a commission if you join Votel through our links. Details
01Two things can be true
Public ratings describe a broad customer experience. Incident archives and detailed complaints describe specific failure modes. Both belong in a fair assessment.
At verification, G2 showed 4.6 out of 5 across 632 reviews, Trustpilot showed 4.9 across nearly 15,000 reviews, and Capterra showed 4.2 across 89 reviews. Product breadth, value, onboarding, automation, and helpful individual support representatives are recurring positives.
G2's review summary identifies learning curve, missing features, lack of intuitiveness, and poor support among recurring negatives. Capterra rates both ease of use and customer service at 3.7. HighLevel's own status archive independently confirms recurring technical incidents.
Our experience is that HighLevel would likely receive more vocal criticism if its owners and team were not so well liked. It can feel disloyal or ungrateful to complain publicly about people you genuinely respect, especially when your community, referrals, training, partnerships, clients, and professional reputation are tied to their ecosystem. We cannot measure how many reviewers feel this pressure, so this is our editorial perspective rather than a proven explanation of reviewer behavior.
In our experience, this is not an isolated event. We have repeatedly watched complaints about outages, bugs, and platform instability disappear quickly from HighLevel's official Facebook group, and we have seen many users complain about the same pattern. A separate user publicly reported that an account-transfer complaint they posted in the group was quickly removed and that they were directed by private message to HighLevel's legal team. Deleted group content cannot be audited retrospectively, and we cannot always distinguish moderator action from Facebook enforcement. We therefore present the repeated pattern as our firsthand observation, supported by an individual public report, rather than claiming a formally documented moderation policy.
02Recurring concerns
These themes appear across official incident notices, moderated review platforms, and user discussions. Forum reports are individual accounts unless an official incident independently confirms the same failure.
The 2026 archive includes incoming calls that could not be answered, Voice AI calls that would not connect, email service degradation, and CRM conversations that would not load. For an agency, these are client-facing failures rather than cosmetic bugs.
In 2026, HighLevel reported Opportunities pages or tabs that would not load, unavailable bulk actions, contacts that were not synchronizing correctly, and appointment data that disappeared from certain views and reports before being backfilled.
HighLevel reported 2026 lag in synchronizing active and finished workflow states, causing advanced filters and smart lists to show inaccurate real-time results. Users also describe race conditions and workarounds that can silently route contacts incorrectly.
The 2026 archive describes slowness across calendars, opportunities, contacts, and related features, as well as loading timeouts, blank pages, and failed page loads after a deployment. User reports also describe buffering, being kicked out, and needing to refresh to restore the expected account state.
Negative reviews and user discussions describe contradictory first-line guidance, long waits for technical escalation, unresolved tickets, and difficulty giving clients a meaningful update. These are reports from individual users, not service-level measurements, but the theme recurs across sources.
A platform incident can become the agency's missed lead, failed appointment, broken campaign, refund, or lost client. Agency owners may sympathize with the vendor and understand third-party dependencies. Their clients usually hold the agency accountable for the outcome anyway.
03Direct agency impact
This selection focuses on incidents where HighLevel's notice documents a direct operational failure and does not identify an outside platform as the cause. It avoids treating failures attributed to infrastructure or integration providers as HighLevel-created outages.
HighLevel reported user-facing authentication failures in its page builder that affected multiple customers. A user who cannot authenticate cannot safely complete or publish client work.
HighLevel reported incoming calls ringing without connecting on both its mobile and web applications. The incident affected customers using LC Phone and integrated numbers, and HighLevel said its engineering team was investigating the root cause.
HighLevel reported order forms failing during submission. For agencies running paid campaigns or ecommerce flows, that failure can interrupt revenue at the point of conversion.
HighLevel reported intermittent 520 errors and failed page loads. Its resolution said the affected deployment was rolled back, making this one of the clearest 2026 examples tied to a platform change.
On consecutive days, HighLevel reported subscription payment failures followed by an unavailable Opportunities tab and unavailable bulk actions for some customers.
HighLevel reported data synchronization problems across contacts and smart lists. Delayed CRM state can affect segmentation, follow-up, reporting, and the automations that rely on current contact data.
04Official status archive
The count covers every distinct notice visible in HighLevel's live public archive from January 1 through September 12, 2026. An incident notice is not automatically a full outage, and notices attributed to an outside provider are not used as evidence that HighLevel caused the failure.
| Claim | GoHighLevel | Votel |
|---|---|---|
Total official incident notices Tie This is a notice count, not a claim that the complete platform went down 94 times. | 94 distinct notices in 2026 through September 12 | No equivalent public archive was available for this review |
Severity approach Tie HighLevel does not publish one consistent critical, major, and minor label across the complete archive, so we describe the documented impact rather than inventing an official severity score. | Prioritize failures that prevent calls, authentication, payments, form submission, CRM access, or accurate synchronization | Apply the same client-impact standard when comparable evidence becomes available |
Outside-provider failures Tie A vendor should not be blamed for an outage it did not cause. | Excluded from the examples used to criticize HighLevel reliability | The same exclusion should apply |
Public transparency HighLevel wins This rewards transparency only. It is not a reliability win. | Dated incident history with descriptions and affected services | No equivalent source used in this comparison |
05Quarterly timeline
Counts come from the live HighLevel archive. July through September is a partial quarter through September 12. The totals include every status notice for archive transparency, while our criticism and examples exclude failures attributed to outside providers.
| Claim | GoHighLevel | Votel |
|---|---|---|
Jan to Mar 2026 Tie | 21 incident notices | No comparable public archive |
Apr to Jun 2026 Tie | 49 incident notices | No comparable public archive |
Jul to Sep 12, 2026 Tie | 24 incident notices | No comparable public archive |
06Buyer checklist
Incident totals are one input. Agencies should test the failure modes that directly affect client delivery.
| Claim | GoHighLevel | Votel |
|---|---|---|
Check the dated incident history HighLevel wins | Official history and third-party monitoring are available | Ask for incident and maintenance history directly |
Test critical workflows Tie | Run messaging, calendars, workflows, and account switching in a trial or existing account | Run the same tasks in the free account before migrating clients |
Plan for service interruption Tie | Keep exports, escalation contacts, and client communication templates ready | Use the same operational fallback plan |
HighLevel publishes a detailed official status history, responds to most negative Trustpilot reviews, and has a large user community that creates more public evidence than a smaller platform. Its ratings are strong, its feature breadth is real, and many incidents are brief, regional, or limited to one service. A raw count of 94 notices must not be rewritten as 94 full-platform outages.
The complaints should not be brushed away simply because many of us like the people behind HighLevel. The official record shows recurring failures that can materially affect agency delivery. But this evidence still does not prove that Votel has zero incidents or is categorically more reliable, because Votel lacks a comparable public archive. The defensible conclusion is that HighLevel's incident burden and recurring support concerns deserve serious weight in an agency's decision.
Try the move safely
Super Votel is a free Chrome-based migration tool for agencies testing a move from HighLevel to Votel. Choose from 13 categories, including websites, funnels, workflows, forms, calendars, contacts, conversations, custom fields, tags, and phone settings. It exports the selected HighLevel data into one zip file that you can bring to Votel for import.
The export also gives you a portable backup and a report of what was captured. Super Votel is an independent tool and is not an official HighLevel or Votel product.
Questions
We counted 94 distinct incident notices from January 1 through September 12, 2026. That is a status-notice count, not 94 complete platform outages.
No. Many notices describe a delayed feature, degraded service, regional issue, or small subset of users. We focus our criticism on incidents that directly disrupted agency work and were not attributed to an outside provider.
A broad rating can reflect value, feature breadth, onboarding, community, and helpful support interactions while individual users still experience costly failures. Trustpilot also says HighLevel actively invites customers to review. None of that invalidates either the positive reviews or the documented incidents.
No. The quarterly archive totals include every notice for transparency, but our criticism and representative examples exclude incidents that HighLevel attributed to an outside infrastructure or integration provider.
There is not enough comparable public data to make that claim objectively. IsDown tracks HighLevel but not Votel, so Votel's incident count cannot be compared on the same basis.
Run the workflows that would hurt most if they failed, including lead capture, message delivery, calendar booking, automations, account switching, and exports. Test with one internal or low-risk client before a larger migration.
Sources for this page
Side-by-side deep dives
Start free, no card required. Or read the full HighLevel vs Votel comparison first, pricing included.
Try Votel free